🔗 Share this article

Through a per curiam order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional district plan that may create up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, issued on Thursday, grants a request by the state to set aside a federal judge's injunction that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the delicate balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in explaining its action.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a method known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the new maps. It had mandated the state to revert to the maps drawn after the 2020 census for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its decision was written by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased partisan advantage, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a breach of the constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Struggle

The ruling comes amid a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Usually, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a chain reaction among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, for their part, have pushed back with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

Conversely, opposition party representatives decried the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

Another leading House leader stated the court had yet again damaged its standing by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.